
Edward Snowden Slams Nvidia RTX 5000 Series as 'Monopolistic Crime' | Image Source: www.techspot.com
Stuttgart, Germany, February 3, 2025 – The latest graphics cards of the NVIDIA RTX 5000 ​series aroused generalized controversy, with criticism of an unexpected but very influential voice: Edward ​Snowden. Known worldwide to exhibit massive ​monitoring programs in 2013, Snowden has now focused its attention on the world of technology, condemning ​the new NVIDIA GPUs for ​what he ​describes as a “bad value” and ” Monopolistic crimes ​against ​consumers. ​” According to Techspot, snowy criticisms ​focus on the inadequate vram of cards, swollen prices and Nvidia market strategies, which claim to prioritize the benefits of the real advantage of consumers.
In an article ​strongly written in his official account ​X, Snowden expressed ​his frustration about ​what he considers ​the “infinite thinking of the next quarter” ​of Nvidia “of Nvidia. He said that this commercial state had ​degraded ​the NVIDIA brand at” level F of value of For levels “, directly pointing to models such as RTX 5070, RTX 5080 and RTX ​5090. His comments have caused fierce debates ​in the ​game and the communities of communities technology., With many consumers echoing their feelings ​about decreasing yields of the latest Nvidia offers.
Why Edward Snowden criticizes Nvidia?
Snowden’s criticism of the NVIDIA RTX ​5000 series revolves around two basic questions: ​insufficient vram and exorbitant prices. In his article, Snowden argued that RTX 5070 should be ​delivered with a minimum ​of 16 GB of VRM instead of the 12 GB of GDDR7 it currently offers. He did not stop ​there: he said that RTX 5080 should ​be available in versions with 24 GB and 32 GB of VRM, while the Lighthouse RTX 5090 should offer variants with up to 48 GB.
According to Snowden, releasing ​a $ 1,000 + GPU in 2025 with only 16 GB of VRM ​is nothing less than “a monopolistic crime against the consumer.” Its use ​of such a strong language highlights the growing ​frustration of technology enthusiasts who believe that NVIDIA takes advantage of its dominant market position to boost too ​expensive products with minimal improvements ​compared to previous generations.
What reveal Nvidia specifications?
The RTX 5000 series, called Blackwell, was ​supposed to mark a significant leap in ​GPU technology. However, ​according to detailed ​criticisms ​of Techspot, generational improvements are disappointing. The RTX 5080, at ​the price of around $ 1,000, offers only an ​increase in 10% yield compared to ​RTX 4080 Super in terms of profitability per table. The RTX 5090, although ​the most efficient, ​offers an increase ​in the yield of 30% despite a cost of at ​least 25% more than its predecessor.
Critics argue that Nvidia’s decision to limit VRM capabilities is strategic. ​By limiting memory in 5080, ​Nvidia ​seems to be silent about consumers around 5090 more expensive, which begins at $ 2,000. ​This tactic ​also leaves space for the possible release of “super” variants with improved vram, very ​high at even higher prices.
How did consumers react?
Despite general criticism, the demand for the consumer of new ​GPU ​is still surprisingly robust. The players and coatings camped outside the stores for days before the ​RTX 5090 and 5080 ​launches, with ​chaotic scenes reported in Japan, while ​people advocated the possibility of buying one of the limited ​units. This paradox of high demand amid negative criticism underlines the powerful adhesion that Nvidia is in the game team market.
However, the ​launch was spoiled by a serious shortage of actions, which led a ​lot ​to label it as a ​”paper release”. In the United States, some microcentral microcentrals would have ​received only four or five RTX 5090 units, leaving countless buyers ​of ​empty hope. This rarity ​has fed resentment, ​with accusations that NVIDIA artificially limits ​the offer ​of creating media ​and justifying high prices.
Is it the sustainable NVIDIA market strategy?
Snowden’s criticism added ​fuel to an ardent debate ​about Nvidia’s long -term commercial strategy. The company’s emphasis on short -term profits, what Snowden calls ​”the next quarter” can erode consumer’s confidence. While Nvidia’s domination allows you to establish premium prices, this approach can ​alienate your customer base ​over time.
Players and professionals have high performance GPU for ​tasks ranging from competitive games to the development of ​AI. If NVIDIA ​continues to prioritize the beneficiaries margins compared to authentic technological progress, competitors such as AMD ​could gain ​ground, especially ​if they offer ​better dollar performance relationships and more price structures adapted ​to consumers.
What do the ​experts in the industry say?
Technological ​analysts are largely in accordance ​with Snowden’s evaluation. According to Techspot, ​his RTX 5080 ​examination highlighted “bad generational improvements” and questioned the proposal of ​the value of ​a $ 1,000 card that barely exceeds its predecessor. Industry ​experts believe that NVIDIA’s current trajectory can lead to a reaction ​if consumers begin to look for alternatives that ​offer better value.
“The launch ​of a $ 1,000 + ​GPU in 2025 with 16 GB paralyzers is a ​monopolistic crime against the consumer.” – Edward Snowden (@snowden)
In ​addition, the technological ​community emphasized that Nvidia’s ​aggressive pricing ​strategy could ​open ​the door ​to new competitors, ​especially because AI -centered applications ​require increasingly powerful equipment. If Nvidia does not respond to these concerns, you ​could lose your competitive advantage in professional ​games and markets.
In ​conclusion, ​Edward Snowden’s unexpected incursion in the critics of the GPU shone hard projectors in Nvidia’s commercial practices. Their comments resonate ​with a growing number ​of ​consumers frustrated by high ​prices, a ​limited vram ​and questionable value proposals. It ​remains to be seen if Nvidia will adjust your strategy in response to this reaction, but one ​thing is clear: the conversation about the prices and the performance of the ​GPU is far from finishing.